University of Florida

EVALUATING SEARCH ENGINES FOR AND WITH K-12 STUDENTS

INTRODUCTION
Scope of this Project
Standards Addressed

COMPARING SEARCH ENGINES
Introduction
Evaluation Criteria
Comparison Chart

SEARCH ENGINES FEATURED
AOL@SCHOOL
Ask Jeeves Kids
Awesome Library
CyberSleuth Kids
KidsClick
Librarians' Internet Index
OneKey (Google Safe Search)
Open Directory Project (Kids and Teens)
Yahooligans!

STUDENT ACTIVITIES
Elementary Lesson Plan
Middle/High School Lesson
Interactive Search Tool Finder

FEEDBACK
Education Search Features
Your Favorite Search Engine

ABOUT ME
Ginger Lindberg


COMPARISON CHART     Printable Version



aolatschool.com/students

ajkids.com


awesomelibrary.org

cybersleuth-kids.com


kidsclick.org


lii.org


(Google Safe Search)
onekey.com


dmoz.org/Kids_and_Teens
Yahooligans!
yahooligans.yahoo.com

Number of Sites
(as of Feb '06)

19,500

undisclosed

30,000

undisclosed

7,000

12,000

billions

38,000

undisclosed

Target Age/Grade

K-12

Ages 7-14

K-12

K-12

Ages 7-12

Grades 6 and Up

All Ages

Under 18

Ages 7-12

Search or Browse?

Both

Search

Both

Both

Both

Both

Search

Both

Both

Editorially Reviewed?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Selection Criteria Posted?

No

Yes

Yes

No Yes

Yes

n/a

Yes

Yes

Clean/Safe?

Yes

Yes

Not all sponsored links/ads are appropriate for kids

Includes several celebrity sites which have photos that are not kid-friendly

Yes

Since focus is for older grades it does include things like nude art and figure drawing

Even with the strictest filtering setting, objectionable content still surfaces

Includes teen homepages of which some include mild profanity

Yes

Any Different Interface for Beginning Readers?

Yes

n/a No No n/a

n/a

No

No

n/a

Update Frequency

Weekly

Ongoing

Monthly

Several times a week

undisclosed

Weekly

Ongoing

Daily

Daily

Includes Advertising

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Any Non-educational Content?

No

No

Video Games, Ecommerce Entertainment, Celebrities

No

No

Everything except porn

Yes

Entertainment, Celebrities, Gaming

Any advanced search features or filter/sort abilities? No No No No Yes, can search on selected fields as well as limit by reading level

Yes, several advanced search features

Yes, search within results

No

No

Pros

- Has built-in spell-check

- Includes separate directory for K-2 students

- Lists grade levels for each site

- Features natural language search

- Accesses several search engines at once

- Provides dates of when sites were added

- When browsing by category it separates resources by type (research, lists, news, multimedia, etc)

- None found

- Maintained by librarians and library school students

- Subject categories well thought out

- Started by the world's first-known "cybrarian"

- Has spell-check utility

- Lists new sites added each week

- Enormous database (seldom see zero results)

- Has dozens of active editors from varied backgrounds adding/reviewing sites

- Simple, clean design; easy-to-use

- Sites chosen (and their descriptions) fit target audience well

Cons

- Site currently doesn't allow you to see 2nd page of search results

- Many categories are too general and are therefore too full for browsing (some categories have hundreds of Web sites listed in them)

- Often results are not relevant or too specific for general questions

- No annotated descriptions makes searching more time intensive (by taking users directly to a site, AJkids may be sending them to irrelevant sites or sites which the user is already familiar with)

- Features separate areas for kids, teens, teachers, etc but when searching in each of these areas the results are exactly the same

- Descriptions are not consistent (some are nonexistent while others go on forever, some are helpful while others are of little use, etc.)

- Includes excessive pop-up ads

- Not all sites are geared for students, kids or teen audience (i.e. home improvement, parenting, college grad job search)

- Database too small

- Copyright is 2004 so it may not be actively maintained

- Many sites too advanced or "collegiate" for middle/high school

- "Kid safe" tagline is incorrect as it includes sites with inappropriate language and photos

- Enormous database (need to narrow search query in order to get more focused results)

- Sites not editorially reviewed

- Technical issues cause random searches to have zero results even though there are plenty

- Sites in other languages are mixed in with the results (and no way to filter them out)

- Includes a large portion of entertainment and non-educational gaming content