|
How effective is DL?
The concerns regarding distance learning's effectiveness
as an educational tool seem justified. In the absence of face
to face teacher-student interaction, are the students actually
learning? The answer is a resounding "yes". Arthur
Cropley and Christopher Knapper, two champions of "lifelong
learning" studied distance research and practice in university
education systems and concluded that distance learning provides
the most effective basis for teaching lifelong learners (Evans,
1996: 175). Numerous studies have shown that with proper development,
distance learners can achieve results that equal or surpass
their conventionally educated peers. For example:
Study of Computer Based Delivery
A study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology
was conducted using 104 electronic technicians. 25 of the
technicians received computer based training from a remote
location, while a control group of 79 technicians utilized
conventional texts in a traditional environment. At the conclusion
of the study, the academic performance of each group was compared
and the researchers observed no significant differences in
examination scores. In fact, the test scores of the computer-based
group were slightly higher! (Verduin, 1991: 220)
Study of Videodisc Based Delivery
A study conducted with 298 soldiers, and published in
Educational Technology Systems, sought to determine the effectiveness
of Videodisc based learning. As in the study of computer-based
delivery, the video-disc trained participants scored significantly
higher than the control group.
Study of Online/Internet Based Delivery (Virtual Classroom)
Perhaps the most significant study reviewed the results
of Online/Internet trained participants versus conventionally
trained participants. In this study, a professor at California
State University at Northridge randomly divided the students
in his applied statistics course into two groups. One group
learned in a "virtual classroom' through the use of on-line
texts, email, real-time chatrooms, and electronic assignments.
The other group received the traditional classroom based lectures
with pen and paper assignments. When concluded, the study
revealed that the Online/Internet trained participants tested
an astounding twenty percent higher than their conventionally
trained peers. (Black, 1997)
post-test results indicate the virtual class has
significantly higher perceived peer contact, and time spent
on class work, but a perception of more flexibility, understanding
of the material and greater affect toward math, at semester
end, than did the traditional class. (Schutte, 1997)
Research on delivery modes and their correlation to student
achievement outcomes has shown that students learn better
via teletraining mode than face-to-face instruction (Chute,
1989)
As for the lack of face-to-face interaction, research conducted
by Linda Harasim at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
found that "on-line learning is not only active, but
it is interactive," (Mason, 1989: 55). Her study of on-line
distance learning programs revealed that the student-student
exchange represented over 80% of the class interaction, compared
with the 60-80% of verbal exchange coming from the teacher
in a conventional classroom environment.
Conferencing exchanges in the [DL] courses are student-centered,
involving dynamic and extensive sharing of information,
ideas, and opinions among learners. Knowledge building occurs
as students explore issues, examine one another's arguments,
agree, disagree, and question positions. Collaboration contributes
to higher order learning, through cognitive restructuring
or conflict resolution, in which new ways of understanding
the material emerge as a result of contact with new or different
perspectives. (Mason, 1989: 55)
|