3rd - early 4th C.= the 3rd century crisis
1. What caused the crisis?
1. there is
a shift from monetary to natural economy (from exchange based on currency
to exchange based on barter)
* the growing
inflation led to the devaluation of the gold coin (solidus)
=> taxes paid in kind
2. decline of
urban centers => shift of emphasis from urban centers to rural areas (ruralization)
* diminished
market economy => difficulties in collecting taxes => increasing fiscal
pressure on urban aristocrats (who fled to the countryside)
3. decline of
large estates and slave - based economy => freed slaves became
colons (juridically free but bound to the
earth) (nobody could kill them or sell them but they had to have permission
for leaving the estate)
* colons worked
the land and retained the product, in exchange paying up to 10% (like medieval
serfs)
4. increasing
political role of the army => civil war (different armies proclaimed their
generals as emperors) => many emperors between 250 - 300
5. relations
with barbarians outside the empire regulated by means of treaties (foedus)(treaty
whereby federates received stipends, right to settle on Roman soil and
to retain their social and political organization in exchange for defending
the Roman frontiers against other barbarians)
* the foedus
was the main mean of accommodation during a period of particularly active
movements of population (the 3rd C = the beginning of the Great Migration)
* barbarians:
- influenced the organization of the army - more cavalry troops
- quickly assimilated into Roman culture and society (officers and generals
of barbarian origin)
- forced Romans to abandon provinces (e.g., Dacia in 271)
2. Structural changes:
- increasing pressure on the frontier
=> changes in the structure of the Roman army:
a. comitatus
- mobile, elite troops under the direct command of the emperor (especially
cavalry troops)
b.
limitanei - military units stationed on the
frontier ( where soldiers received land grants)
- increasing pressure on the central
government => changes in the form of government - the Tetrarchy
(286)
-
introduced by emperor Diocletian (284-305)
- power divided
between two full emperors (Augusti) and two vice emperors (Caesares) -
each one with his own court, army, and capital city (4 emperors)
- radical changes
in imperial ceremonial (the Dominate, i.e., the emperor as absolute monarch,
not first magistrate of the state - Dominus et Deus)
- declining
political role of the Senate => increasing political role of the imperial
council (Consistory - Consistorium)
- radical administrative
reform: provinces lumped together into dioceses (ruled by vicars) (the
church borrowed the administrative terminology of the late Roman empire)
- decentralization
=> growth of alternative capitals (Rome ceases to be the only political
center)
330: Constantine I moves the capital to the East - Constantinople
- increasing
role of religion in the representation of imperial power => 313: Edict
of Milan = Christians allowed to perform freely their religion
* Constantine
- used Christian symbols in the army (vision before the battle at the Milvian
Bridge)
3. Constantine the Great:
- after defeating his rival in the
East - Licinius => he became sole ruler (end of Tetrarchy -324) => drastic
changes:
a. new capital (Constantinople)
- modeled after Rome ( BUT: churches instead of temples, Hagia Sophia)
b. promoted large numbers of barbarians
into the army (esp. Goths)
c. legislation inspired by Christianity
(first protection of widows and children; he dealt with divorce and abortion)
d. 325: summoned the Council of
Nicaea:
1. rigidly defined
faith (Nicaean Creed) => defined heresy (Arianism = denied the unity of
the Holy Trinity)
2. direct intervention
of the emperor in Church affairs (Caesaropapism = the head of the state
is also the head of the Church)
* Arianism did
not died out => Constantine's successor, Constantius II favored Arianism
and encouraged Arian missions to the Goths => bishop Ulfila translated
the Bible into Gothic => barbarians founding successor states within the
Roman empire embraced Arianism as a form of non-Roman group identity